Rebecca Marino vs Emily Appleton Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 11 Jun at 08:46 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
R. Marino vs E. Appleton

CAN
1
Win
Played
0
Win

GBR
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Marino 1 - 0 Appleton
They have played 3 sets in total, with Rebecca Marino winning 2 and Emily Appleton winning 1. The last match between Rebecca Marino and Emily Appleton was at the Lexus Ilkley Open - Ilkley, 12-06-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Grass, with Rebecca Marino getting the victory 2-6 6-4 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Marino | 1 |
| Appleton | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) Lexus Ilkley Open - Ilkley(06-12-25)
R. Marino vs E. Appleton H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $1,359,860 | Career Prize Money | $5,694 |
| 61.19% (391-248) | Career Total W/L | 50.69% (221-215) |
| 1 | Grass | 0 |
| 17 | Titles | 4 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 33.33% (3-6) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
R. Marino vs E. Appleton Match Preview:
- Second Serve: Marino has a slight edge, winning 42% of points compared to Appleton's 40.7%. Could this serve performance be the deciding factor?
- Return Game: Appleton excels, winning 51.77% of opponent's second serve points, while Marino achieves 50.08%. This marginally favors Appleton.
- First Serve Returns: Appleton leads here as well, winning 28.5% vs. Marino's 26.03%, suggesting a stronger return capability.
- Under Pressure: Marino shows composure under pressure, saving 54.19% of breakpoints compared to Appleton's 50.95%, potentially crucial during tight moments.
- Overall Performance: Marino has a higher match win rate over the last year at 61.97%, outperforming Appleton's 55.36%. Does this indicate stronger consistency?
- Surface Preference: Marino excels on Hard courts with a 64% win rate, slightly better than Appleton's best surface, Indoor Hard, at 59%.
- Player Level: Marino has competed against tougher opponents with an average rank of 230.72, compared to Appleton's 349.13, highlighting greater exposure to high-quality play.
- Deciding Sets: Appleton has a slight upper hand in clutch situations, winning 56% of deciding sets, compared to Marino's 52%.
- Break Point Conversion: Appleton is slightly more effective, converting 35.59% of breakpoints, edging out Marino's 33.33% conversion rate.
Editorial Prediction (June 11, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming match between Appleton and Marino presents a fascinating contest of strengths and strategies. Appleton demonstrates superior return game skills, having converted a higher percentage of opponent serves and breakpoint opportunities. This capability might play a critical role in tilting longer rallies in their favor.
Marino, however, brings commendable experience against tougher opponents and performs consistently under pressure. This suggests a mental and strategic advantage, particularly in crucial match phases, and while they slightly edge out in second serve performance.
Given the overall performance statistics and recent form, Marino's consistency on hard surfaces and strength in pressure situations make them the favored contender to secure a victory in this match.
Rebecca Marino vs Emily Appleton Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
R. Marino vs E. Appleton H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 14 | Games Won | 13 |
| 6 | Aces (Total) | 9 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 13 |
| 1:54:17 | Average Match Time | 1:54:17 |
| 53% (45/85) | 1st Serve % | 53% (50/94) |
| 67% (30/45) | 1st Serve Win % | 76% (38/50) |
| 57% (23/40) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (18/44) |
| 33% (3/9) | Break Pts Won % | 75% (3/4) |
| 40% (38/94) | Return Points Win % | 38% (32/85) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
R. Marino Recent Matches Played
E. Appleton Recent Matches Played

R. Marino vs E. Appleton Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60.93% (382/245) | YTD Win/Loss | 50.69% (221/215) |
| 58.80% (859/602) | Sets Win/Loss | 50.95% (509/490) |
| 53.42% (7343/6403) | Games Win/Loss | 50.99% (4701/4519) |
| 63.29% (262/152) | Hard Win/Loss | 48.51% (65/69) |
| 46.03% (29/34) | Clay Win/Loss | 45.74% (59/70) |
| 65.00% (65/35) | Indoor Hard W/L | 60.00% (81/54) |
| 52.00% (26/24) | Grass Win/Loss | 42.11% (16/22) |
| 0.47 | Aces Per Game | 0.39 |
| 3149 | Aces Total | 1773 |
| 0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.48 |
| 1450 | Total Double Faults | 2173 |
| 1:2:12 | Average Match Time | 1:27:20 |
| 444.65 | Average Opponent Rank | 506.35 |
| 57% (17545/30959) | 1st Serve % | 59% (15688/26701) |
| 71% (12470/17545) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (10655/15688) |
| 48% (6491/13414) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (4759/11012) |
| 42% (1424/3362) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (1402/3105) |
| 42% (12845/30912) | Return Points Win % | 43% (11832/27293) |
| 50.77% (33/32) | Slam W/L | 40.00% (2/3) |
| 41.30% (19/27) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 33.33% (4/8) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 51.56% (66/62) | Main Tour W/L | 22.22% (4/14) |
| 67.47% (224/108) | Challenger W/L | 44.40% (115/144) |
| 81.82% (36/8) | Futures W/L | 64.94% (100/54) |
| 61% (380/624) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 51% (220/435) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 52% (87/166) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (42/88) |
| 54% (112/208) | Deciding Set Win % | 47% (60/128) |
| 89% (364/324) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (230/191) |
| 11% (364/40) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (230/39) |
| 22% (263/58) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (206/30) |